We all have our own biases when it comes to assigning credibility, or blame based on how we view actions taken in life by other people. It is something I have thought about lately, not just about what this post is about, but in other areas of life as well. This morning I was thinking about how justifications, and denial are used within the adoption community, specifically with mothers who speak out about their treatment by an agency.
If a mother says she was promised an open adoption and it was closed, some will automatically go to the assumption that she crossed some boundary. The justification is that the adoptive parents are blameless, and she is not a victim because she chose adoption, and should have known open-adoption wasn’t legally enforced.
Or if a mother speaks out about her experience with being counselled to choose adoption, and how they made her feel unworthy to parent, and how pressured she felt in the hospital to not let the prospective parents down, yet looking back she see’s that the practice as wrong, she is told she made a free choice, should have said no, and done more research. That she has to live with the choices she made, and is not a victim of an unethical agency. Even if she says she trusted them because they have been in the business for a long time, she is still not a victim – or she is just not believed, because of the reputation of the agency among adoptive parents.
Yet, on the other hand, we can see and identify victims of long-standing Ponzi schemes. Schemes that continued on for decades like the famous one. Where most thought he was the best in the business, yet many lost their life savings, their retirement, their future. We see them as victims. A few will say they made a choice or should have known it was too good to be true, that they should have done more research, but most will say they were just middle class families who trusted someone with a stellar reputation. That they were victims and couldn’t have foreseen what the outcome would be.
If we consider the life situation between a mother facing a crisis pregnancy that is also very time constrained by the very nature of pregnancy vs. a person or couple who are at the point in their life where they are able to put money away for their future – between the two - who is in the more vulnerable position in need of the higher level of protection, who is most likely not to have the time to do their due diligence, or the life skills to know better?
I just wish that the next time people who would answer “but you had a choice” – would stop and think about it.
June 2013: The intent of this blog is not to exclude anyone in adoption, rather open conversations where people from all segments in adoption can talk together. Wide-sweeping statements that are derogatory against an entire segment in adoption is clearly not appropriate, using inflammatory terms against any segment will also shut down the conversation.
If you can't be civil then all comments will be moderated and unfortunately - some won't be approved.
Tiger Woods US Open 18th June ( 2000 ) : Tiger Woods wins the 100th US Open at Pebble Beach, California winning by an unheard of 15 strokes ahead of his competion ending with a 12 under for the course. Rioting South Africa 18th June ( 1976 ) : Rioting in South Africa spreads throughout the country. At least 58 people were reported dead and 788 injured due to […]