Monthly Archives: January 2011
A rule isn’t unfair if it applies to everyone. - unknown
seriously why don’t legislators and the adoption industry understand sealing our original birth certificate away from the adult adoptee is wrong – when it can be summed up in one simple sentence?
All truth passes through three stages: First it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed and third it is accepted as being self-evident. - unknown
when will the third stage happen for adoptee rights?
Behind every argument lies someone’s ignorance. - Louis D. Brandeis
and that is all it is – someone’s ignorance - in the battle for the adult adoptees right to their original birth certificate…
If not today–when? - Kashmiri
seriously – when – how many adoptees will not live long enough to see rights restored?
Cutting off a mule’s ears doesn’t make it a horse. – Creole
could not say it better…
Every day of your life is a page of your history. - Arabic
sadly many of us are missing pages…
Half the truth is often a whole lie. – Ben Franklin
so related to being an adoptee…
other gems that seem to appropriate to our world…
Don’t judge of men’s wealth or piety by their Sunday appearances. - Ben Franklin
If someone gives you advice, it is in his own interest. - Tunisian Proverb
It is not fair to ask of others what you are not willing to do yourself. - Eleanor Roosevelt
The end doesn’t justify the means. – Ovid
The road to hell is paved with good intentions. - Samuel Johnson
All are not saints, who go to church.- Italian
sayings found at wiseoldsayings.com
I stumbled upon this report while researching Massachutts history as one side of my family settled there in the 1600′s. There are several different Mass reports available and being intrigued, I started reading and realized that this Mass report in particular talked about what we have today known as Safe Haven. Stop now if you are not into history as it gets quite long…
The details below that are italicized are direct quotes from this report. “…” denotes where I have skipped parts of a statement or paragraph(s). I found it fascinating to read not only this but the other reports on how society worked back then in what seems to me, the start of foster care. Some of the reports are from men who really tried to make things better and spoke out about the injustices in the different asylums and poor houses. Just like today there are those who do speak up in an effort to make things better in the future and those who like the status quo as is.
Note if you read the actual reports they use language that is not politically correct today but it was the language back then.
The Fifth Annual Report of the Board of State Charities of Massachusetts, to which are added the Reports of the Secretary and the The General Agent of the Board January, 1869.
At the start of this it states “the Secretary begins his Annual Report, [herewith submitted,] with a brief sketch of what has been accomplished directly and indirectly, by the labor of this Board during the five years of its existence.”
Under the subtitle “Foundling and Deserted Children” it delves into the subject of the history of Foundling Hospitals and finally the Revolving Cradle. “the history of Foundling Hospitals – their origin in the earliest times, their wide popularity, rapid extension, abuses, disfavor, and decline, furnish an instructive lesson for the student of sociology.”
Further down in this subtitle on page xlix is:
Government, therefore, by letters patent, directed that foundlings should be left to the care of private charity.” It appears to have been customary, from very early times, to place some of these infants in beds at the entrance of churches; and for those in charge of them to stand and cry to passers, “Help, for these poor innocents.…
But the popular sentiment of charity, unguided by wisdom, called for more foundling hospitals; and they were multiplied, and came to be considered as essential features of every Christian and civilized community.
They were encouraged by governments, and by the religious orders; and grew, by endowments, in wealth and size, until there are some which count their children by thousands, and reckon their income by millions of dollars.
The priests, nurses, officers and employees grew to be an army, with all the vices, peculations, and abuses which such armies engender.
It then goes on to talk about this further and words are not minced…and talks about mortality rates of these infants in other institutions up to 90% and ends with…
Such is the consequence of being led blind-folded by the beautiful sentiment of mercy, into wholesale measures, without the use of reason.
One of the most interesting features of the Foundling Hospitals is the Revolving Cradle, placed in a niche in the street wall of the building. Indeed it is a type of the establishment. Born of the same tender sentiment, it produces, when not regulated by reason, the same evil consequences.
A person could approach this Revolving Cradle, at any time, of day or night, place a child within its warm blankets, pull a bell, and flee away unobserved; or, watching a moment, could see the light stream from the opened wicket, the infant tenderly removed, and the Cradle swung out again for the next comer.”
These Revolving Cradles were multiplied extensively over Europe. In France alone were two hundred and fifty-seven hospitals or asylums for foundlings, of which two hundred and seventeen had the Revolving Cradles. Most of these were so placed that any one could deposit an infant without being seen. in a few cases they were watched; and whoever left a child was obliged to make himself known.
After it became to appear that the multiplication of these establishments increase the number of foundlings, wise men called for their abolition; but, like all rooted institutions, they found ardent defenders. Arguments and even stubborn facts, could not meet sentimental appeals, like that of Lamartine, who said of the Cradles, that “they have no eyes to see, no ears to hear, no tongue to betray the unfortunate mother, but they have welcoming arms for her babe.”
Napoleon (to whom France was as a great nursery for growing soldiers,) declared, with a flourish of humanity, that the State must be the parent to all foundlings, and all abandoned or orphan children; and he encouraged all kinds of establishments for their nurture.
The church, which found in these establishments a source of influence, and an employment for her servants, resisted all attempt to lessen their number and extent.
But the numerous evils and abuses engender in such un-natural families, and their unfavorable influence upon public morality, became so manifest, that great foundling hospices are no longer in favor. Three-quarters of the hospitals of France have been closed; and most of the Revolving Cradles abolished. Their place is being taken, their work is much better done, and their principal evils avoided,
First, by small establishments, calculated to lessen the temptations to abandonment of children, such as the creeches of France and Belgium; establishments which take charge of infants during the day while the mothers are at work.
Secondly, by societies for the care of orphans and abandoned children, the leading principle of which is opposed to the vicious one of aggregation, and favors separation and diffusion by boarding out the children among ordinary families….
Third, by temporary asylums, or transient homes, of which one of the best specimens is the Massachusetts Asylum, established last year at Dorchester, and now located in Brookline.
I then checked to see if Wikipedia had anything on it and found it under the title of Baby Hatch and references the ones talked about above as Foundling Wheels. There are a couple of pictures of these Foundling Wheels that give you an idea of what they were like.
In France, foundling wheels (tours d’abandon, abandonment towers) were introduced by Saint Vincent de Paul who built the first foundling home in 1638 in Paris. Foundling wheels were legalised in an imperial decree of January 19, 1811, and at their height there were 251 in France, according to Anne Martin-Fugier, a writer on women’s issues. They were in hospitals such as the Hôpital des Enfants-Trouvés (Hospital for Foundling Children) in Paris. However, the number of children left there rose into the tens of thousands per year, as a result of the desperate economic situation at the time, and in 1863 they were closed down and replaced by “admissions offices” where mothers could give up their child anonymously but also received advice. The tours d’abandon were officially abolished in a law of June 27, 1904. Today in France, women are allowed to give birth anonymously in hospitals (accouchement sous X) and leave their baby there.
Take 10 minutes to listen to her words, it is worth it, trust me.
Isn’t the title a loaded statement in the adoption world?